USPTO serial 76607494
GREASE RAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OLANDRIA, WARREN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREASE RAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEWBERRY SPRINGS, CA
NEWBERRY SPRINGS, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps, perfumery, cosmetics, and hair lotions | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, belts, blouses, bras, dress pants, dresses, gloves, jeans, jackets, jumpsuits, lingerie, overalls, pajamas, sweatshirts, sweaters, socks, scarves, suspenders, swim trunks, swim suits, namely, swim suit tops and bottoms, sweat bands, skirts, stockings, shorts, smocks, t-shirts, tank tops, ties, underwear, vests, visors, work shirts, work pants, tank top undershirts, wind resistant jackets, and work aprons; footwear, namely, steel toe boots, flip flops, sandals, shoes, and slippers; and headwear, namely, bandanas, beanies, and hats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARCHIBEK, BRANDAN BEN
- Other trademarks owned by ARCHIBEK, BRANDAN BEN
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named GREASE RAG
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | PGRN | PETITION GRANTED - ISSUE NEW NOA | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |