USPTO serial 76607602
SOUTHLANDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOUTHLANDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Greenwood Village, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad J. Hattenbach
BRAD J HATTENBACH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPT390 UNION BLVD STE 650LAKEWOOD, CO 80228-6512UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | REAL ESTATE MARKETING SERVICES, NAMELY MARKETING RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL COMMUNITIES FOR LEASING AND PURCHASE | ACTIVE | May 31, 2001 |
| 036 | REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, NAMELY FINANCIAL INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE, LAND ACQUISITION, REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE, LEASING OF REAL ESTATE, AND LEASING OF SHOPPING CENTER SPACE | ACTIVE | May 31, 2001 |
| 037 | REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT, NAMELY LAND DEVELOPMENT IN THE NATURE OF SITE SELECTION AND PLANNING AND LAYING OUT OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL COMMUNITIES; CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, NAMELY MANAGEMENT, PLANNING, AND SUPERVISION OF RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES, COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, AND SHOPPING CENTERS | ACTIVE | May 31, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |