USPTO serial 76607812
KABAB-JI RESTAURANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KABAB-JI RESTAURANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jal el Dib, Metn, LB
Jal el Dib, Metn, LB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew W. Ransom
ANDREW W RANSOM MALLOY & MALLOY PA2800 SW 3RD AVEHISTORIC CORAL WAYMIAMI, FL 33129Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | (Based on Intent to Use) Clothing, namely uniforms, shirts, pants, shorts, skirts, dresses, jackets, shoes and caps | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | (Based on 44(e)) Meat, fish, poultry and game birds; conserved, dried and cooked jelly, jams and marmalade; egg; yogurt based beverages; yogurt and diary products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt, oil and edible fats; canned, and processed fruits and vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | (Based on 44(e)) Coffee, tea, cacao, sugar, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee, namely, processed coffee substitutes; flour and processed grains in the nature of extracts; bread, pies, sweets, namely, pastries; ice cream, bee honey and black honey, yeast and yeast powder, salt, mustard and vinegar, pepper and spices, ice; and meat concentrate products, namely, sauces prepared with beef, veal, lamb and/or chicken | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | (Based on 44 (e)) Fresh fruits and vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | (Based on 44 (e)) Beer; mineral and soda water, non-alcoholic beverage, namely, lemonade, soft drinks, soda, fresh fruit and vegetable juice, fruit-extract beverage and juice, other beverage preparations, namely colas | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | (Based on Intent to Use) Retail store services featuring food and beverage items for consumption; franchising, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of restaurants, catering services and retail stores | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | (Based on Intent to Use) Delivery of food by restaurants | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | (Based on Intent to Use) Interior decoration consultation, namely sign, equipment and fixture placement to allow for the most ergonomically and aesthetically efficient and marketable operation of restaurants, catering services and retail stores | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | (Based on Intent to Use) restaurant services featuring dine in, take-out services; catering services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kabab-ji SAL
- Other trademarks owned by Kabab-ji SAL
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named KABAB-JI RESTAURANT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |