USPTO serial 76607889
RISTORANTE TOSCANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RISTORANTE TOSCANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cordon Bleu International Ltée
Ville d'Anjou, Québec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Harrison
MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, vegetables and pasta; pasta entrees, filled pasta; fresh, preserved and frozen fruits and vegetables, dried fruits, candied fruits, dried tomatoes; dairy products, namely milk, cheese, ice cream, gelati, dairy desserts; alimentary pasta, rice, rizotto dishes; chicken terrines, ham terrines, ham pates, liver pates, chili spread, paysan pates, merchant pates, meat pates (ham, pork, veal and chicken), meat pies, boned chicken, beef stew, meat loaf, chicken stew, Irish stew, chicken flakes, ham flakes, marinated tongues, black pudding, meat, poultry and fish of all kinds, game and prepared meals with game, seafood, non-alcoholic fruit and vegetable juices, jams and marmalades, fruit jellies, spreads, coffee, tea, beef sauces, three pepper sauces, mushroom sauces, dijonnaise sauces, bordelaise sauces, chicken sauces, turkey sauces, hot chicken sauces, Bar-B-Q sauces, sauces for poutines, broth, dehydrated gravy mixes, marinades, food flavourings and colorings, tomato paste, soups and soup mixes, antipasto, pizza, calzone, focaccia, gnocchi, preserved fish, fruits and vegetables, chili, beans, chick peas, lentils, pork and beans, bread crumbs, salt, pepper, spices, Italian sausages, meatballs, veal dishes, olives, olive oils, pesto, condiments, dill pickles, salad dressings, vinegar, bread, cakes, pies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |