CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MULT-E KIT

USPTO serial 76607912

MULT-E KIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3093711Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 16, 2006
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MULT-E KIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward D Lanquist, Jr.

Edward D Lanquist, Jr. Patterson Intellectual Property Law1600 Division Street, Suite 500NASHVILLE, TN 37203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ballasts and ballast replacement kitsEXPIREDFeb 11, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2016CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jun 16, 2015NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED—
Jun 16, 20158.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jun 15, 20158.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Jun 15, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 15, 2015MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2011NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED—
Aug 22, 2011C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 22, 2011815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Aug 22, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 27, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 6, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 5, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 19, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Feb 21, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 17, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 5, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance