USPTO serial 76607938
MEDIAATM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDIAATM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Russell D. Harris
Russell D. Harris Mel S. Martin, P.C.Suite D2925282 South Commerce DriveMurray, UT 84107Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for distribution of text, audio, video and multimedia data; prerecorded digital storage media of text, audio, video, and multimedia data; prerecorded audio, video and multimedia data of music, musical performances, and musical artists | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring prerecorded digital storage media, and prerecorded audio, video and multimedia data; online retail of prerecorded digital storage media, and prerecorded audio, video and multimedia data | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing on-line discussion forums for transmission of messages among computer users concerning a wide variety of topics in the nature of audio, video, and multimedia artists and titles | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Online publications, namely catalogues and newsletters, featuring a wide variety of topics in the nature of audio, video, and multimedia artists and titles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mediaport Entertainment, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Mediaport Entertainment, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MEDIAATM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2009 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |