CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for KITCHENSCAPING

USPTO serial 76608142

KITCHENSCAPING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3184247Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 12, 2006
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with KITCHENSCAPING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher E. Gatewood

Christopher E. Gatewood Threshold Counsel, PC1905 Huguenot Road, Suite 200Richmond, VA 23235UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric kitchen appliances, namely, mixers and food and beverage blendersSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 16, 2006
011Electric kitchen appliances, namely, toasters and coffee makersSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 16, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Nov 7, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 11, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 13, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 12, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 3, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Sep 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 28, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 18, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance