CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for K9

USPTO serial 76608235

K9

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOTT, JASON E
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with K9?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Garner K. Weng, Esq.

Garner K. Weng, Esq. Hanson Bridgett LLP425 Market Street, 26th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94105-5401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Eyewear, namely, glasses and sunglassesACTIVE—
014EARRINGS AND OTHER JEWELRY EXCEPTING JEWELRY SOLD IN STORES AND OTHER ESTABLISHMENTS SELLING WATCHESACTIVE—
018LEATHER GOODS, NAMELY, LEATHER BRIEFCASES, LEATHER KEY CASES, TOTE BAGS, BACKPACKS, PURSES AND HANDBAGSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 27, 2010PC.DPETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED—
May 21, 2010APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
May 18, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 10, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 9, 2009PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 9, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 21, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 21, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 4, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 4, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 31, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 31, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 19, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 25, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 25, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 11, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 29, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 16, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 16, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 8, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 7, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 28, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2006CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2006GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2006CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Aug 1, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 11, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 22, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 5, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance