USPTO serial 76608252
THE THREAD THAT RUNS THROUGH MIGHTY LEAF IS THE HUMAN TOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3213777Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 27, 2007
- Examiner
- WILLISTON, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE THREAD THAT RUNS THROUGH MIGHTY LEAF IS THE HUMAN TOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Rafael, CA
San Rafael, CA
San Rafael, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles C. Valauskas
Charles C. Valauskas VALAUSKAS & PINE LLC150 S WACKER DR STE 620CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Beverage flavoring extracts; beverage flavoring additives for non-nutritional purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mighty Leaf Tea
- Other trademarks owned by Mighty Leaf Tea
- Other trademarks owned by Mighty Leaf Tea
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named THE THREAD THAT RUNS THROUGH MIGHTY LEAF IS THE HUMAN TOUCH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 12, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |