USPTO serial 76608497
MAILBOX IT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAILBOX IT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan A. Bay
333 Park Central ESuite 314Springfield, MO 65806-2226Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Postal services, namely, rental of mail boxes, mail forwarding, packaging articles for transportation, and receipt and delivery of mail and parcels for others | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 12, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 12, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |