USPTO serial 76608641
IBOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IBOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Price
ANDREW D. PRICE VENABLE LLP575 7TH STREET, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumes; non-medicated toiletries; oils for toiletry purposes; cosmetics; hair care preparations; non-medicated skin care preparations; bath beads; bath crystals; bath foams; bath gels; bath lotion; bath milks; bath oils; bath pearls; bath powder; bath salts; bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form; bubble bath; body and beauty care preparations; aromatherapy oils; aromatherapy creams; and aromatherapy lotions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |