USPTO serial 76609054
ARMOURFIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MADDEN, ANNE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARMOURFIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Christchurch, NZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald L. Dennison
DONALD L DENNISON DENNISON, SCHULTZ, DOUGHERTY & MACDONALD1727 KING ST STE 105ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2700UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Protective clothing and helmets for sports | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, headgear and footwear, namely, hats, caps, boots, sports jerseys, shorts, sweaters, t-shirts, rugby jerseys, track suits, fleece tops, knit tops, socks, leisure jackets, shirts, pants, dresses, skirts, blouses and hosiery- | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Padded protective clothing for sports, shoulder pads knee guards and shin guards for sports | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |