USPTO serial 76609170
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick H. Colen
FREDERICK H COLEN REED SMITH LLPPO BOX 488PITTSBURGH, PA 15230-0488UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | DINNERWARE AND TABLEWARE, NAMELY, DINNER PLATES, SALAD PLATES, CUPS, SAUCERS, EGG CUPS, TEAPOTS, CREAMERS, SUGAR BOWLS, SERVERS, BOWLS, PLATTERS, SOUFLLE DISHES, AU GRATIN DISHES, MUGS, SALT AND PEPPER SHAKERS, COFFEEPOTS, PITCHERS, COVERED VEGETABLE DISHES, TUREENS, GOBLETS, BUTTER DISHES, CRUET SETS; CERAMIC BASKETS FOR DECORATIVE PURPOSES; CERAMIC BOXES FOR DOMESTIC USE; CASHE POTS AND PLANTERS; CANDLEHOLDERS, NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; CANISTERS; CERAMIC CARD HOLDERS FOR USE WITH TABLE SETTINGS; NAPKIN RINGS, NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; CERAMIC STATUETTES; TRAYS FOR DOMESTIC USE, NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; GLASSWARE; AND VASES | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2000 |
| 024 | NAPKINS, TABLE PLACE MATS, TABLECLOTHS ALL MADE FROM TEXTILES; AND TABLE LINENS | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |