USPTO serial 76609178
CORNELIA ESSENTIALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CORNELIA ESSENTIALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine M. Baker
CHRISTINE M. BAKER MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS ET AL P.C.666 THIRD AVENUECHRYSLER CENTERNEW YORK, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated skin care and hair care preparations; beauty products, namely, beauty creams, gels, lotions, masks, milks and serums; cosmetics; ambiance products, namely, aromatherapy oils and scented room sprays and essential oils for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Medicated skin care preparations; health shakes namely, nutritional shakes for use as a meal substitute | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Brochures featuring information on skin and body care; paper and plastic shopping bags; cardboard floor display units for merchandising products | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Cosmetic bags sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Applicator sticks for applying makeup; facial sponges for applying makeup; hair and makeup brushes; home furnishings, namely, tea sets, decanters and service trays, honey dishes, stainless steel serving trays, and drinking glasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Bedding, namely, bed blankets, wool blankets, throws; home furnishings, namely, towels, bed sheets and comforters | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Hair accessories, namely, bands, elastics, barrettes, hair clips, claw clips, curl clips, bows, buckles, extension pieces, and scrunchies | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Fruit-based snack food; vegetable-based food beverages; yogurt-based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Beverages made of tea; tea; honey | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Drinking water | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely, prepared alcoholic cocktails consisting of martinis | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services, mail order catalog and online retail store services featuring skin and hair care preparations, cosmetics, medicated skin care preparations, ambiance products, namely, oils and room sprays, cosmetic bags, cosmetics and skin care applicators and hair brushes, bedding, food and beverages and tea | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cornelia Zicu International, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Cornelia Zicu International, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named CORNELIA ESSENTIALS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 1, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |