Drawing for TODDWORLD

USPTO serial 76609360

TODDWORLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TODDWORLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Perry J. Viscounty

Perry J. Viscounty LATHAM & WATKINS LLP650 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 2000COSTA MESA, CA 92626-1925UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded video and audio cassettes, compact discs, phonograph records, digital video discs all featuring animated cartoons and motion picture films for education and entertainment of children; sound and video recordings featuring a series of children's programs, theatrical, and musical performances; video game cartridges, video games recorded on CD-ROM for use in video game machines; computer products, namely, mouse pads, game cartridges for computer video games and video output game machines for use with televisions and instructional materials sold as a unit, computer game cassettes, computer game tapes and manuals sold as a unit, children's educational computer software and children's entertainment computer software for animated cartoons and motion picture films incorporating music, video, live action, animation, and interactive components; sunglassesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 4, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 28, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 28, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 24, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 3, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 26, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 26, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 9, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 2, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 12, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 20, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance