USPTO serial 76609481
ARCHIMEDES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JULIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARCHIMEDES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fluid Dynamics Studio Co., Ltd.
Kawasaki-si, Kanagawa-ken, JP
Fluid Dynamics Studio Co., Ltd.
Kawasaki-si, Kanagawa-ken, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Harrison
MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20045-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MASSAGE APPARATUS, BOTH ELECTRIC AND NON-ELECTRIC; MASSAGE CHAIRS; PILLOWS FOR MEDICAL USE; BEDS FOR MEDICAL USE; MASSAGE APPARATUS FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | BEDS; CHAIRS; SOFAS; PILLOWS; CUSHIONS; FURNITURE | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | RENTAL OF BEDS, PILLOWS, CHAIRS, AND CUSHIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | RENTAL OF BEDS FOR MEDICAL USE, MASSAGE CHAIRS, AND PILLOWS FOR MEDICAL USE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fluid Dynamics Studio Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Fluid Dynamics Studio Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named ARCHIMEDES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |