Drawing for COFFEE TIME

USPTO serial 76609766

COFFEE TIME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COFFEE TIME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID M. SIGMON

DAVID M SIGMON DORITY & MANNING PAPO BOX 1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021disposable products for use with coffee beveragesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Oct 13, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Sep 30, 2005LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED
Sep 30, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 31, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 3, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance