Drawing for RECEIVE-N-STORE

USPTO serial 76609957

RECEIVE-N-STORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RECEIVE-N-STORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bernhard Kreten

Bernhard Kreten BERNHARD KRETEN, ESQ. & ASSOCIATES1331 GARDEN HWY STE 300SACRAMENTO, CA 95833-9773UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal support bracketsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 21, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 21, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Sep 27, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 14, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 11, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 28, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 14, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 12, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 14, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 14, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 28, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 13, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 11, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2005CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Mar 31, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Mar 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance