USPTO serial 76610512
FRAG DOLLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3211717Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 20, 2007
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FRAG DOLLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephanie Maillot
MURACCINI MARC UBISOFT DIVERTISSEMENTS INC.5505 ST-LAURENT BLVDSUITE 5000MONTREAL, QC, H2T1S6Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing an on-line computer game for others over global and local area computer networks; providing online computer game competitions for others over global and local area computer networks; [ providing information on-line relating to computer games, video games and other on-line entertainment, namely, online games; ] providing information on-line related to educational services, publication services, editorial services, and sporting; and; [ ultural activities; ] organizing education and/or entertainment competitions; educational services in the nature of arranging and conducting colloquiums, conferences, and congresses; organizing exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes; and providing on-line correspondence courses related to computer and telecommunications techniques; publication services, namely, publication of books, text books, newspapers, magazines, pamphlets; editorial services, namely, editing books, newspapers, magazine articles and reviews; educational services, namely, teaching and instruction in the field of computer and telecommunication techniques; conducting on-line exhibitions and displays and interactive exhibits in the field of computer and telecommunication techniques; entertainment services, namely, the production of films and television shows | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 28, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |