USPTO serial 76610521
HWA YO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HWA YO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
GYEONGGI-DO, 469-881, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LINUS Y. PARK
VOLENTINE FRANCOS PLLC LINUS Y PARK11951 FREEDOM DR STE 1260ONE FREEDOM SQRESTON, VA 20190-5650Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Rum, Perry, Bupju [Korean traditional rice wine], Soju [Korean liqueurs distilled or diluted], Yag-ju [refined rice wine], Sake, Tak-ju [unstrained rice wine], Strawberry wine, Tonic liquor flavored with plum extracts, Wild grapes wine, Kirsch, Vermouth, Vodka, Brandy, Cider, Champagne, Absinthe [liqueur], Whisky, Citron wine, Ginseng [liqueurs], Cocktails, Wine, Gin, Wine coolers, Compound rice wine [clear], Alcoholic extracts, Bitters, Arak, Curacao, Liqueurs, Anise [liqueur], Fruit extracts [alcoholic], Aperitifs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |