USPTO serial 76610560
OASIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OASIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louise K. Miller
LOUISE K MILLER CONLEY ROSE PCPO BOX 684908AUSTIN, TX 78768-4908UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic, electro-optical and optical networks for data exchange, particularly for on-board-electronics of vehicles, home-networking, PC-networking, industrial automation and building automation, consisting of modules, electronic, electro-optical and/or optical circuits and software; electronic, electro-optical and/or optical components of said networks, particularly data lines and data bus systems comprising data lines and components for controlling the transmission of data over data lines, connectors and interfaces, transmitters and receivers, transceivers, digital signal processors, integrated circuits, microprocessors, controllers, A/D and D/A converters, and devices for providing virtual user/system interfaces; software, in particular for data exchange in electronic, electro-optical and optical networks, for providing virtual interfaces, for managing of physical interfaces, for emulating of network devices and for providing virtual user/system interfaces; electronic devices for entertainment electronics and communication technology,namely radios, radio receivers, TV receivers, CD players, CD recorders, CD changers, Videodisc, DVD players, DVD changers, computers with Internet access, laptop computers with Internet access, navigation apparatus for vehicles, global positioning systems (GPS), satellite receivers, loudspeaker systems, amplifiers, AJD and D/A converters, liquid crystal and flat-panel displays and screens, digital video broadcast (DVB) transmitters and receivers, personal digital assistants (PDA), telephones, mobile phones, security devices, namely, location tracking apparatus for vehicles, cockpit instruments, namely, electronic indicator devices for vehicles,voice entry and output devices, namely, microphones, speakers and amplifiers, and video game machines for use with computers and televisions | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing training and conducting seminars in the design and use of plastic optical fiber networks in automobiles, networking, automotive electronics, communication technology, and audio and video applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design and consultation for others, not including the field of finance; design of integrated circuits and chip development for others; licensing network technology for electronic, electro-optical and optical networks for data exchange | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 4, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |