USPTO serial 76610617
FLEET RUNNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLEET RUNNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lev K. Martyniuk
LEV K MARTYNIUK DETERS, BENZINGER & LAVELLE, PSC207 THOMAS MORE PKWYCRESTVIEW HILLS, KY 41017-2596UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER (ASP) FEATURING COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF SCHOOL BUSES AND STUDENT TRANSPORTATION VEHICLES; FOR USE IN MONITORING FIXED ASSETS AND INVENTORY; AND FOR USE IN MONITORING SCHOOL EMPLOYEES AND THEIR TESTING, CERTIFICATION AND EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTATION, AND COMPUTER SERVICES NAMELY CREATING AND MAINTAINING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | Aug 12, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 4, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |