USPTO serial 76610914
GYRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 2006
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GYRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Conservation Technology, L.L.C.
Northbrook, IL
Conservation Technology, L.L.C.
Northbrook, IL
Conservation Technology, L.L.C.
Northbrook, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GERALD M. NEWMAN
GERALD M. NEWMAN SCHOENBERG FISHER NEWMAN & ROSENBERGSUITE 2100222 SOUTH RIVERSIDE PLAZACHICAGO, IL 60606-6101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PRODUCTS, NAMELY TRACK LIGHTING FIXTURES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Conservation Technology, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Conservation Technology, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Conservation Technology, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named GYRO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 2, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |