USPTO serial 76611089
BIO-CLEAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIO-CLEAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George Pappas
GEORGE PAPPAS PAPPAS LAW OFFICES919 S HARRISON ST HARRISON PLSTE 300FORT WAYNE, IN 46802-3698Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Lake and pond additive containing bacteria, namely aerobic and anaerobic bacteria for treating dead organic matter, namely sludge, muck, fish and fowl debris, and dead vegetation | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |