USPTO serial 76611561
AAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3056924Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 7, 2006
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Fe Springs, CA, US
Santa Fe Springs, CA, US
Santa Fe Springs, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tony W. Wong
Tony W. Wong David and Raymond Intellectual Property Law Firm108 N Ynez AveSuite 128MONTEREY PARK, CA 91754-1680Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | cast iron parts for cooking equipment namely, broilers, grates, burner heads, griddle plates, jet burner heads, restaurant ranges, griddle, hot plates, low-boy ovens, double stack ovens, lamb ovens, tri-level ovens, infrared broiler, upright over fire broiler, convection oven, fryers, stock pots, chicken rotisseries, Chinese pork roasters, wok ranges, and char-broiler; iron castings for cooking equipment namely, broilers, grates, burner heads, griddle plates, jet burner heads, restaurant ranges, griddle, hot plates, low-boy ovens, double stack ovens, lamb ovens, tri-level ovens, infrared broiler, upright over fire broiler, convection oven, fryers, stock pots, chicken rotisseries, Chinese pork roasters, wok ranges, and char-broiler; metal castings for cooking equipment namely, broilers, grates, burner heads, griddle plates, jet burner heads, restaurant ranges, griddle, hot plates, low-boy ovens, double stack ovens, lamb ovens, tri-level ovens, infrared broiler, upright over fire broiler, convection oven, fryers, stock pots, chicken rotisseries, Chinese pork roasters, wok ranges, and char-broiler | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 20, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 20, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 17, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |