Drawing for REGGE LEMON

USPTO serial 76611767

REGGE LEMON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
WILKE, JOHN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with REGGE LEMON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald L. Dennison

DONALD L. DENNISON DENNISON SCHULTZ DOUGHERTY1727 KING ST STE 105ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2700UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Skin and body lotions and gels, skin creams, skin masks, soaps, and skin lightenerABANDONEDApr 20, 1997
005Medicated skin care preparationsABANDONEDApr 20, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISIONโ€”
Sep 19, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISIONโ€”
Sep 19, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999โ€”
May 16, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999โ€”
May 16, 2006OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTABโ€”
Apr 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Feb 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Feb 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Feb 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Feb 8, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Jan 31, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Jan 31, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Jan 9, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
Jan 9, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTENโ€”
Jan 3, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Nov 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Nov 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Sep 15, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
Sep 15, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTENโ€”
Sep 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Sep 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Sep 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Jul 14, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
Jul 13, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTENโ€”
Jul 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
May 31, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
May 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
May 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Apr 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Sep 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance