USPTO serial 76612227
HIGH GRADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HIGH GRADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miguel Villarreal, Jr.
MIGUEL VILLARREAL JR GUNN & LEE PC700 N ST MARYS ST STE 1500SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205-3541UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Transmission fluid; brake fluid; power steering fluid; chemical additives for enhancing the performance of lubricating oils, greases, and internal combustion engine fluids; chemical engine treatments and additives for engine oils, transmission fluids and cooling systems; automobile power steering system leak sealants; chemical motor oil additives; detergent additive for use with motor oil; degreasing preparations for use on automotive engines, aromatic solvents for industrial and commercial use, antifreeze, and windshield antifreeze fluids | ACTIVE | Oct 11, 2004 |
| 004 | Engine oils; lubricating oil for the motor vehicle engines; non-chemical engine treatments and additive for engine oils, transmission fluids and cooling systems; motor oil; non-chemical motor oil additives; automobile lubricants; all purpose lubricants; automotive greases, lighter fluid; general purpose greases; granular absorbent oil-based composition for absorbing oil and grease; and lubrication grease for vehicles | ACTIVE | Oct 11, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |