USPTO serial 76612736
ADVICS ADVICS PREMIUM BRAKE PADS CARBON CERAMIC FORMULA EXCEPTIONAL BRAKING POWER LONGER PERFORMANCE LIFE HIGH QUALITY MATERIALS LOW DUST FORMULATION PRECISION ENGINEERED SMOOTH BRAKING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3310245Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 16, 2007
- Examiner
- FISHER, LATONIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ADVICS ADVICS PREMIUM BRAKE PADS CARBON CERAMIC FORMULA EXCEPTIONAL BRAKING POWER LONGER PERFORMANCE LIFE HIGH QUALITY MATERIALS LOW DUST FORMULATION PRECISION ENGINEERED SMOOTH BRAKING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill Anderfuren
Jill Anderfuren MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP233 S WACKER DRIVE63RD FLOORCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Brake pads for land vehicles; (Based on Use in Commerce) shims for brakes, brake pads with brake pad wear indicators, sold as a kit, all spare parts of automobile brakes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 29, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Advics
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Advics
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Advics
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named ADVICS ADVICS PREMIUM BRAKE PADS CARBON CERAMIC FORMULA EXCEPTIONAL BRAKING POWER LONGER PERFORMANCE LIFE HIGH QUALITY MATERIALS LOW DUST FORMULATION PRECISION ENGINEERED SMOOTH BRAKING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 16, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 19, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | ISIR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | ISIR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 14, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |