USPTO serial 76613522
GO! ORGANIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GO! ORGANIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tanya M. Reitzel
TANYA M. REITZEL COASTAL TRADEMARK SERVICESBOX 12109; SUITE 2200555 WEST HASTING STREETVANCOUVER BC, V6B 4N6Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | nutritional supplements for dogs and cats, namely, vitamins, herbs containing organic ingredients; herbal anti-itch and sore skin ointment containing organic ingredients for use on pets | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | dog food, cat food, rabbit food, edible dog treats, edible cat treats, edible chews for animals, all containing organic ingredients | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Can-Pro Pet Products Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Can-Pro Pet Products Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named GO! ORGANIC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |