USPTO serial 76613542
DUET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ELMHURST, IL
Richardson, TX
Richardson, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kay Lyn Schwartz
KAY LYN SCHWARTZ GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP1601 ELM ST STE 3000THANKSGIVING TWR IP SECTIONDALLAS, TX 75201-4761Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Dual-interpreter computer software platform for programmable central controllers, interface cards and interface devices used as an integral component in remote control and automation systems for use with audio, video, security, lighting, motor and environmental equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 9, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |