USPTO serial 76613628
PROGRESS TELECOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROGRESS TELECOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ST. PETERSBURG, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shyam N.S. Dixit Jr.
SHYAM NS DIXIT JR TRENAM KEMKER2700 BANK OF AMERICA PLZ101 E KENNEDY BLVDTAMPA, FL 33602Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES FEATURING VOLUME BASED PRICING BASED ON CUSTOMER COMMITMENT LEVELS, NAMELY, TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION SERVICES, PROVIDING FIBER OPTIC NETWORK SERVICES, PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, PROVIDING A HIGH SPEED ACCESS TO AREA NETWORKS AND A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK, AND PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER DIAL-UP AND DEDICATED ACCESS TO THE INTERNET; THE FOREGOING INCLUDING ETHERNET, WAVELENGTH, SECON AND SONET/SDH SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |