USPTO serial 76613653
LADY RAMPANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LADY RAMPANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Ostfeld
DAVID M OSTFELD ADAMS & REESE LLP1221 MCKINNEY ST STE 4400ONE HOUSTON CTRHOUSTON, TX 77010Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Golf instructional videos that are pre-recorded on video cassettes, DVDs, mini DVD's and downloadable software featuring Internet clips | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Golf apparel, namely, golf hats, golf shirts, golf shoes, golf socks, golf shorts, golf pants and golf jackets | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Golf equipment, namely, golf clubs, golf putters, golf balls, golf tees and golf bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education and Entertainment, namely, providing an on-line computer golf game | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Firelight Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Firelight Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named LADY RAMPANT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |