USPTO serial 76613912
SCHÄR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DEBRA ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCHÄR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
1-39014 Burgstall/Postal (BZ), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip K. Fitzsimmons
PHILIP K FITZSIMMONS SHLESINGER, FITZSIMMONS & SHLESINGER183 E MAIN ST STE 1323ALLIANCE BLDGROCHESTER, NY 14604-1621Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Low Protein Dietetic Foodstuffs For Medical Purposes, Gluten-Free Dietetic Foodstuffs For Medial Purposes And Dietetic Foodstuffs For Medical Purposes For Diabetics, In Particular Soups And Ready Made Dishes, Biscuits, Wafers, Bread, Foccacia Bread, Pasta, Milk-Based Beverages, Cheese, Charcuterie | ACTIVE | May 31, 2000 |
| 029 | Dietetic Foodstuffs (Not For Medical Purposes), In Particular Soups And Ready-Made Dishes, Milk-Based Beverages, Cheese, Charcuterie | ACTIVE | May 31, 2000 |
| 030 | Dietetic Foodstuffs (Not For Medical Use), In Particular Biscuits, Wafters, Bread, Foccacia Bread, and Pasta | ACTIVE | May 31, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |