Drawing for UNION PARK

USPTO serial 76613962

UNION PARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HELFMAN, JUDITH MICHELLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNION PARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer K. Craft, Esq. and Robert B. Kouchoukos, Esq.

Jennifer K. Craft Gordon & Silver, Ltd.3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, 9th FloorLas Vegas, NV 89169UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Real estate listing and brokerage services; providing information in the fields of investment, banking, financial management, real estate, real estate brokerage services, real estate professionals, interest rate information, financial information, and real estate listing, leasing, appraisal, acquisition, management, research, consultation and escrow services; banking services on and through a local and global computer network; financial valuation, analysis, consultation, planning and management; homeowner's insurance agencies, administration, consultation and brokerage services; mortgage insurance agencies, administration, consultation and brokerage services; renter's insurance agencies, administration, consultation and brokerage services; homeowner's insurance underwriting services for homeowner's insurance; mortgage insurance underwriting services for mortgage insurance; and renter's insurance underwriting services for renter's insuranceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 31, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 31, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 31, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 31, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 23, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 4, 2006CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 4, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 14, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 11, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 4, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance