Drawing for REALITY EVOLUTION

USPTO serial 76614137

REALITY EVOLUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REALITY EVOLUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert B.G. Horowitz

Robert B. G. Horowitz Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Signal and format converters for Digital Versatile Disc recorders and/or players, video tape recorders and/or players, video disc players and/or recorders, hard disc players and/or recorders, stereo tuners, television tuners and radio tuners, digital still cameras, television sets, liquid crystal displays, plasma displays, and photographic projectors, video projectors, computer projectors, liquid crystal display projectors and slide projectors; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 21, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 18, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 13, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 9, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 5, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 4, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 31, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 24, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 28, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 27, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 5, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance