USPTO serial 76614171
GELSPRINTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GELSPRINTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter D. Murray
Peter D. Murray Cooper & Dunham LLP30 Rockefeller Plaza 20TH FloorNew York, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL PRODUCTS NAMELY, CHEMICALLY TREATED PAPERS PLATES, FILMS AND FOILS FOR PHOTOGRAPHIC, DUPLICATING, COPYING, AND PRINTING PURPOSES; FIXERS, FIXING AGENTS; LIGHT, HEAT, AND PRESSURE SENSITIVE REPROGRAPHIC MATERIALS, NAMELY, DIAZO SENSITIZED PAPER | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | CHEMICAL PRODUCTS FOR PHOTOGRAPHIC, DUPLICATING, COPYING, AND PRINTING PURPOSES, NAMELY, DEVELOPERS, TONERS, PRINTING INKS; TONER CARTRIDGES FOR USE IN COPYING MACHINES, FACSIMILE MACHINES, PRINTING MACHINES AND PRINTERS; PRINTING PIGMENTS, TONER CONTAINED IN CARTRIDGES; FILLED INK; INKS, NAMELY, INKS CONTAINED IN ROLLER CASSETTES; TONER CARTRIDGE FOR USE IN COPYING MACHINES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PAPER; ELECTROSTATIC SENSITIZED PAPER; OFFSET MASTER PAPER; XEROGRAPHIC PAPER; THERMAL PAPER; PLAIN PAPER; DUPLICATING INKS AND DUPLICATING PAPER; MIMEOGRAPH MASTER PAPER ALSO KNOWN AS MASTER PLATES, AND MASTER FILM FOIL; THERMAL RIBBON FOR PRINTERS; FILMS FOR PLAIN PAPER COPIER OR OVERHEAD PROJECTOR; PRINTER RIBBON CARTRIDGES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ricoh Company, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Ricoh Company, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named GELSPRINTER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |