Drawing for OLD SCHOOL BURGERS

USPTO serial 76614318

OLD SCHOOL BURGERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3197132Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 9, 2007
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OLD SCHOOL BURGERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jamie B. Bischoff

CLUBHOUSE SPORTS CORPORATION18695 EAST STAGE RUN ROADPARKER, CO 80134UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043restaurant and carry out food servicesSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDFeb 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2013C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Jun 18, 2013CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 14, 2013CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Feb 7, 2013PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 9, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 2, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 13, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Nov 7, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 7, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 4, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 4, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 4, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 7, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 11, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 7, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance