USPTO serial 76614562
MALLYGIRL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, MICHELLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MALLYGIRL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
Jess M. Collen Collen IP Intellectual Property Law, P.C.80 South Highland AvenueTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BUILDINGOssining, NY 10562Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS; MAKE-UP PRODUCTS FOR THE FACE AND BODY; EYE SHADOW, LIPGLOSS, LIPSTICK, MASCARA, LIP LINERS, POWDERED AND LIQUID BLUSH, NAIL POLISH, BODY SPRAYS, BODY LOTIONS, BATH GELS, FACIAL MOISTURIZERS, FACE SERUMS, NON-MEDICATED LIP BALM, NON-MEDICATED LIP CREAMS, NON-MEDICATED LIP CARE PREPARATIONS, FACIAL TONERS, BODY TALC, ARTIFICIAL EYELASHES, ARTIFICIAL FINGERNAILS, ASTRINGENTS FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES, BABY LOTION, BODY EMULSIONS, BODY MASK CREAMS, BODY MASK LOTIONS, BODY MASK POWDERS, SKIN CONCEALERS, FACIAL CONCEALERS, BODY CONCEALERS, EYE PENCILS, EYE MAKEUP REMOVER, EYE GELS, EYE CREAM, EYEBROW PENCILS, EYELINERS, FACE CREAMS, FACE POWDER, FACIAL MASKS, FACIAL SCRUBS AND BODY SCRUBS, FOUNDATION MAKEUP, LIP CREAM, MAKE-UP REMOVER, NAIL CREAM, NAIL ENAMEL, NAIL GLITTER, SKIN CLEANSERS, WRINKLE REMOVING SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS, HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, HAIR COLOR REMOVERS, HAIR COLOR, HAIR CONDITIONERS, HAIR DRESSINGS FOR MEN, HAIR DYE, HAIR GEL, HAIR LIGHTENERS, HAIR LOTIONS, HAIR MASCARA, HAIR MOUSSE, HAIR POMADES, HAIR RELAXERS, HAIR RELAXING PREPARATIONS, HAIR SPRAY, HAIR RINSES, HAIR STYLING PREPARATIONS, SCULPTING GEL, SHAMPOO, SHAMPOO-CONDITIONERS, STYLING GELS, STYLING LOTIONS, TALCUM POWDER, COTTON BALLS FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES, PRE-MOISTENED COSMETIC TOWELETTES, PRE-MOISTENED COSMETIC WIPES, SELF-TANNING LOTIONS, SOAPS FOR HANDS, FACE AND BODY, SUN BLOCK PREPARATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 26, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 30, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 26, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 7, 2012 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |