USPTO serial 76615112
MAJOR LEAGUE BOWLING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAJOR LEAGUE BOWLING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William A. Munck
WILLIAM A. MUNCK MUNCK BUTRUS, P.C.DOCKET CLERKP.O. DRAWER 800889DALLAS, TX 75380Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, BOWLING ALLEY SERVICES, ORGANIZING BOWLING TEAMS AND ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING AMATEUR AND PROFESSIONAL BOWLING EVENTS AND EXHIBITIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |