USPTO serial 76615113
MAJOR LEAGUE BOWLING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAJOR LEAGUE BOWLING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William A. Munck
DOCKET CLERK DAVIS MUNCK PCPO BOX 800889DALLAS, TX 75380-0889UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | BOWLING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, BOWLING PINS, BOWLING BALL RETURNS, BOWLING BALLS, BOWLING BALL COVERS, BOWLING PINSETTERS AND PARTS THEREFORE, BOWLING BAGS, BOWLING DEFLECTORS, BOWLING GLOVES, BOWLING PIT MATS, AND MASKING UNITS TO HIDE THE PIN SPOTTERS FROM THE BOWLER'S VIEW | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |