CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SHOCK

USPTO serial 76615604

SHOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FISHER, HANNAH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William C. Wright

WILLIAM C WRIGHT EPSTEIN DRANGEL BAZERMAN & JAMES LLP60 E 42ND ST STE 820NEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Newspapers, magazines, series of non-fiction books, newsletters, event albums, all covering current events, unusual events and famous people's lives; photographs; wall calendars and postersACTIVE—
038Radio, telegraph, telephone, television communication; rental of teleprocessing and computer communication apparatus and instruments; transmission of messages; transmission of telegrams; communications by computer terminals, communication via multinational telecommunication networks, providing of telecommunications connections to information system networksACTIVE—
041Publication of printed matter, photographs, books, newspapers, magazines, all covering current events, unusual events and famous people's lives, online publication of articles and photographs about current events, unusual events, and famous people's lives; production of radio and television programs in the field of entertainment; entertainment services in the nature of competitions in the field of current events, unusual events and famous people's lives; entertainment in the nature of competitions, namely, selection of photos, videos, weblogs and texts by the publicACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 24, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 30, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 10, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 7, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 16, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance