USPTO serial 76615615
SMARTNAV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMARTNAV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bedfordshire MK43 0TR, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AMY E. CARROLL
AMY E CARROLL C/O DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR PROVIDING VEHICULAR AND TRAFFIC INFORMATION AND VEHICULAR INSTRUCTIONS; ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS LOCATABLE IN OR ON VEHICLES FOR PROVIDING VEHICULAR INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION CONCERNING THE VEHICLE AND FOR CONTROLLING THE VEHICLE; ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR IMMOBILIZING VEHICLES; ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR MONITORING VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC; ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR TRACKING VEHICLES; ELECTRONIC CONTROL STATIONS (GOODS) AS CENTERS OF OPERATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | PROVISION OF VEHICULAR AND TRAFFIC INFORMATION AND VEHICULAR INSTRUCTIONS; PROVISION OF VEHICLE INFORMATION RELATING TO ANY OF ITS LOCATION, IDENTITY, DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND SPEED; MONITORING VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC; MONITORING OF TRAFFIC CONGESTION AND SPEED; TRACKING OF VEHICLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | ADVICE AND DESIGN SERVICES IN RESPECT OF TRAFFIC AND VEHICULAR INFORMATION, OF INSTRUCTION AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT, AND OF TRACKING AND IMMOBILIZATION OF VEHICLES BY REMOTE CONTROL | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |