Drawing for RETAIL BLADE

USPTO serial 76616234

RETAIL BLADE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FARRELL, ANNE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RETAIL BLADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Serge Anissimoff

SERGE ANISSIMOFF ANISSIMOFF & ASSOCIATES235 N CTR RD STE 201LONDON, ON N5X 4E7CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer systems for point of sale store management; Computer hardware for computer systems for point-of-sale store management systems, namely, computer interface boards, computer processing components in the nature of computer central processing units, computer networking devices in the nature of computer networking hardware, computer network hubs, computer printed circuit boards, computer motherboards, computer chips, computer memory cards, computer microprocessors, computer hard drives, electrical power supplies for computers, computer serial ports, computer parallel ports, computer cables, computer network switches, computer peripherals, computer data connections in the nature of a computer chipset for use in transmitting data to and from a central processing unit, and computer power bus connections in the nature of LAN (Local Area Network) access points for connecting network computer users; Computer programs, computer software and computer firmware for use in point-of-sale store management systems.ACTIVE—
037Installation and repair of computer systems for point-of-sale store management.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 23, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 23, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 19, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 5, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 3, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 29, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 29, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 8, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance