Drawing for POWER BOND

USPTO serial 76616320

POWER BOND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWER BOND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael W. Goltry

Michael W. Goltry Parsons & Goltry4000 North Central AvenueSuite 1220Phoenix, AZ 85012

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
013BulletsACTIVEFeb 5, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 16, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 16, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 29, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 23, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 23, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2009GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2009GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2009CNESSU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN—
Sep 12, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 20, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 17, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 9, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 9, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2009CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 24, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2008CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2008SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 16, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 16, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 15, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 2, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 2, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 6, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 29, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 29, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 16, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 16, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 13, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 17, 2005CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 16, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 16, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance