Drawing for OPTIMAL SINEWAVE TRACKING

USPTO serial 76616333

OPTIMAL SINEWAVE TRACKING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2974811Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 19, 2005
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with OPTIMAL SINEWAVE TRACKING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Component of voltage surge suppressors, namely, a circuit designed to protect sensitive electronic equipment from damage caused by internal transient activitySECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2014C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Feb 1, 2011PRA8POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8—
Feb 1, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 30, 2011ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2005R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
May 26, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 20, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 18, 2005CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
May 18, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 18, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance