USPTO serial 76616388
WEE WORSHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WEE WORSHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONN K. HARMS
DONN K HARMS AMERICAN PATENT & TRADEMARK LAW CENTER12702 VIA CORTINA STE 100DEL MAR, CA 92014-3769UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed material in the nature of calendars, a series of baby and children's books, address books, autograph books, bookmarks, decals, posters, trading cards, trading card albums, greeting cards, sheet music, photo albums, scrapbook albums, sticker albums, pens, pencils, pen and pencil holders, pen and pencil boxes, arts and crafts paint kits, stickers, and printed teaching materials for teaching in the fields of youth developmental skills, life skills and problem solving | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, dresses, jumpers, cardigans, jackets, socks, belts, knit shirts, sport shirts, sweat shirts, T-shirts, ties, pants, sweaters, socks, underwear, shorts, beach visors, beachwear, swimsuits, hats, caps, beanie caps, pullovers, overalls, sporting shirts, jerseys, pajamas, shoes, and footwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys, namely, action toys, bathtub toys, construction toys, pet toys, plush toys, ride-on toys, sandbox toys, squeeze toys, wind-up toys, musical toys, crib toys, crib mobiles, stuffed toy animals, children's multiple activity toys, adults' and children's party games, all types of dolls, doll accessories, climbing units, children's play cosmetics, card games, role playing games, board games and card games for teaching of alphabet, math, music, and language, and, adult and children's sporting goods, namely, playground balls, beach balls, basketballs, baseballs, baseball bats, baseball mitts, ball hoops and fishing rods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GENIUS PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GENIUS PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named WEE WORSHIP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 3, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |