Drawing for SEALTECH

USPTO serial 76616522

SEALTECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEALTECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Walter D. Ames

WALTER D AMES6718 WEMBERLY WAYMCLEAN, VA 22101-1530UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017synthetic polymers used in the form of a foam positioned in building vents to keep undesirable elements from entering the building while permitting the passage of heat from the buildingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 22, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 2, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 30, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 22, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 21, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 14, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 12, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 11, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 24, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 16, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 31, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance