Drawing for VIAZISSYSTEM

USPTO serial 76616554

VIAZISSYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIAZISSYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Carstens

DAVID W CARSTENS CARSTENS & CAHOON LLPPO BOX 802334DALLAS, TX 75380-2334UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Orthodontic and Dental ServicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 29, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 20, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 30, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 7, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 6, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 14, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 18, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 17, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 13, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance