USPTO serial 76616973
AIRGUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 21, 2009
- Examiner
- OKEKE, BENJAMIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AIRGUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
3eTechnologies International, Inc.
Rockville, MD
Other trademarks owned by 3eTechnologies International, Inc.
3eTechnologies International, Inc.
Rockville, MD
Other trademarks owned by 3eTechnologies International, Inc.
3eTechnologies International, Inc.
Rockville, MD
Other trademarks owned by 3eTechnologies International, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence Harbin
LAWRENCE HARBIN MCINTYRE HARBIN & KING LLP500 9TH ST SEWASHINGTON, DC 20003-2838UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunication products, namely, secure communication devices for wireless networks; telecommunication products for secure communication devices, namely, wireless access points, bridges, repeaters, gateways, routers, servers, and client devices; wireless network devices and data terminals; portable data processing devices, namely, computer and related wireless communication software to operate wireless devices; processor devices for implementing wireless encryption protocols; modems; and secure communication and encryption software for wireless products to enable authentication and information exchange (none of the foregoing shall include network cards, PC cards, express cards, or embedded modules) | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2005 |
| 038 | Secure wireless electronic transmission of voice signals, data, facsimiles, images, and information | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2005 |
| 042 | Technical consultation in the field of secure wireless network equipment for use and deployment of wireless communications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 3eTechnologies International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 3eTechnologies International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 3eTechnologies International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AIRGUARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |