USPTO serial 76616974
BLADE POS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLADE POS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Burlington, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Serge Anissimoff
SERGE ANISSIMOFF ANISSIMOFF & ASSOCIATESSTE 201, 235 N CTR RDLONDON, ON N5X 4E7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer systems for retail point of sale and store management, particularly for interconnecting retail and store systems components; computer hardware for computer systems for retail point of sale and store management, particularly, computer interface devices, computer processing components, computer networking devices, computer hubs, computer printed circuit boards, computer motherboards, computer chips, computer cards, computer microprocessors, computer hard drives, computer power supply units, computer ports, computer cables, computer switches, computer peripherals, computer data connections, and computer power bus connections; computer programs, computer software and computer firmware for use in computer hardware control and management; computer programs, computer software and computer firmware for use in data processing and management in the field of retail and store management; pre-recorded data storage media containing software for use in hardware control and management in the field of retail and store management; pre-recorded data storage media containing software for use in data processing and management in the field of retail and store management | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | installation of computer systems for retail point of sale and store management; repair of computer systems for retail point of sale and store management; computer consulting services for retail point of sale and store management; computer programming services for others for retail point of sale and store management; implementation of computer software, hardware and systems for retail point of sale and store management; development of computer software for others for retail point of sale and store management; and, maintenance services for computer software, hardware and systems and equipment for retail point of sale and store management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |